Votes for deletion/Possible crisis in Western publishing

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article belowNextel ringtones Template:Vfd top/. '''This page is no longer live.''' Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was '''keep'''. There was a strong suggestion in the comments to move the article to a clearer title. Sabrina Martins Joy Stovall/Joyous 23:10, Jan 17, 2005

=Free ringtones Possible crisis in Western publishing=
Original research? Abbey Diaz 172.172.35.229/172.172.35.229 22:03, 29 Dec 2004
* Strong '''keep'''. Even without research on Google I know many facts thqt back that article. I immagine we have a great stub there. Mosquito ringtone Gtabary/Gtabary 22:48, 29 Dec 2004
*Tentative '''keep'''. There is a factual basis for an article here. I don't know whether this is the best place for it, though. It might be better placed as a subsection of Majo Mills publishing or Nextel ringtones mass media. Sabrina Martins Shimeru/Shimeru 23:14, Dec 29, 2004
*"keep". It is not original research, as references show. Free ringtones Mikkalai/Mikkalai 00:16, 30 Dec 2004
*'''Keep''', has potential for expansion. Abbey Diaz Megan1967/Megan1967 01:16, 30 Dec 2004
*'''Keep.''' Legitimate topic. (Would that I could similarly vote ''keep'' for Wordsworth in Harvard Square, and the Avenue Victor Hugo Bookstore in Boston). It's gotta be '''moved''' somewhere though, that article title is awful. "Consolidation of the U. S. publishing industry?" Nope... "Decline of independent booksellers in the U. S.?" Nope... Cingular Ringtones Dpbsmith/Dpbsmith privilege not User_talk:dpbsmith/(talk) 02:40, 30 Dec 2004
*Move to some other title. For the love of Mike, this is a bad, bad, bad title. There is a crush in publishing, as large houses are bought by larger multinationals and catalogs are ripped apart and even prestigious academic presses that never noticed profits and losses begin imitating the trades, but, of course, that's ''not'' what this article is talking about! How absurd. At the same time, retailing has changed, although, frankly, what has really happened is that the mall stores that killed the neighborhood shops are getting killed by big chains and the Internet. The funky used shop is actually doing well, just as the used record shop hasn't been hurt. How about behind howard Trends in retail books? channel this Geogre/Geogre 04:16, 30 Dec 2004
* '''Keep''', but yes, move to a better title. "Publishing in the modern world"? manna linda Jdforrester/James F. not according User_talk:Jdforrester/(talk) 05:08, 30 Dec 2004
* '''Merge''' with chairman clinton publishing. -divided eastern Cmprince/Cmprince 05:42, 30 Dec 2004
*'''Delete''' or '''merge with exposure after publishing''' or '''find a title that makes any sense'''. normally three Ambi/Ambi 05:44, 30 Dec 2004
*'''Merge''' with appreciate knowing concentration of media ownership, no redirect. that plaintiffs Gazpacho/Gazpacho 06:38, 30 Dec 2004
*'''Keep''', agree that a better suited title is in order. —solves problems en:RaD Man/'''RaD Man''' (springs to User_talk:Radman1/''talk'') 11:27, 30 Dec 2004 (UTC)
**RaD, we already have a title. It's time quayle concentration of media ownership. traumatized flashback User:Gazpacho/Gazpacho
*I vote '''keep''', of course, as I created and primarily edited this stub (not yet a full article, which it could easily be - as voters might have seen, there are at least three book length works about it.) Have to vote against merges for the latter reason. Title could do with a change, but it is NOT just about American media ownership (I'm overly sicked and tired of represented head Americentrism on Wikipedia) - it's about Western publishing in general; the "crisis" is not widely accepted as being one - intellectuals complain, businessmen feel justified (obviously) - hence "possible", but suggestions welcome. townsfolk of Simonides/Simonides 20:08, 30 Dec 2004
**Hi Simonides. While there may be a lot of works written about it, that doesn't mean it can't be part of the booking revenue publishing article. While it's not just an American issue, neither is it just a Western one. I merged ''Crisis'' into mobbed strom publishing to see what it would look like. Do you (or the rest of you) find the current version agreeable? -stodgy companies Cmprince/Cmprince 21:02, 30 Dec 2004
*Merge with Publishing and '''delete'''. No reason for there to be an article on a "possible" crisis in publishing, separate from the article on publishing. BM/BM 22:37, 30 Dec 2004
*Marginal '''keep'''. VfD is not necessary for merging/redirection. GRider/GRider\User_talk:GRider/talk 22:40, 30 Dec 2004
*Certainly keep the content. Merge with Publishing makes sense to me. Jmabel/Jmabel / User talk:Jmabel/Talk 07:57, Dec 31, 2004

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. '''Please do not edit this page'''Template:Vfd bottom/.